Build software together while AI writes the code.
x
S4 · SeoulMohd Murtuza Ali CEO · Mirza Anwaarullah Baig CTO
www.mind-alike.comTwo people start building. One explains the architecture on a call. The other builds in their own editor. By tomorrow, the contexts have diverged. Nobody remembers what was decided.
Every builder develops their own prompting style. When they work together, the AI sees fragmented input. The output reflects it.
Architecture choices, trade-offs, product decisions. They happen in conversation, not in the tool. Next session, they're gone.
The actual coordination happens in chat apps, voice calls, screen shares. The building tool is just where the code lives. The real work is scattered.
The bottleneck is shifting from code generation to coordination.
One person can now build what previously required a team. The generation barrier is gone. The coordination barrier is just getting started.
People increasingly build through AI, communities, agents, and distributed expertise. The unit of creation is shifting from the individual to the group.
Today's tools still assume a single builder. Cursor, Lovable, Replit. All single-player. The infrastructure for teams building with AI does not exist.
"AI changed the cost of creation. Mindalike changes the way creation happens."
Project memory, prompts, and decisions persist across sessions and collaborators.
One AI, one conversation. Both builders contribute to the same prompting thread.
See each other's cursors, edits, and AI output as it happens.
Bring an idea or join someone else's. Every prompt and decision is visible to all collaborators from the start.
Invite a collaborator or get matched. Enter a shared session where the AI context is already built up.
Prompt together. Edit together. The AI handles the code. You handle the judgment, taste, and direction.
Context intact. No one started from scratch. Product launched faster than either builder could have done alone.
Multiplayer coding environment with shared context and real-time collaboration.
| AI Coding | Multiplayer | Persistent shared context | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cursor | ✓ | ✗ | limited |
| Lovable | ✓ | ✗ | limited |
| Replit | ✓ | ✓ | partial |
| Mindalike | ✓ | ✓ | built around it |
People already using Cursor, Lovable, Replit, or Claude to build products. They've felt the wall where solo prompting stops working and coordination begins.
Solo builders who want to ship faster with a collaborator but don't have a co-founder or team. They need a way to find the right person and build together immediately.
2-5 person teams building with AI. They need shared context, shared prompting, and a way to bring in expertise without giving full repo access.
Teams that form fast, build fast, and need to coordinate under pressure. The exact environment where Mindalike's value is obvious within minutes.
Why they come: building with another person is better than building alone. The session creates relationships. Relationships become projects. Projects attract more builders.
What we're proving next: "N teams ran M collaborative sessions this week. X% came back next week." That single retention number beats all vanity metrics.
I spent the last several years building in high-intensity environments where small teams had to turn ideas into working products quickly. Hackathons. AI projects. Web3 builds. Multiple teams, multiple collaborators, multiple tools. The tools got dramatically better. The collaboration layer didn't. Every time, the same gap: building is easy; coordinating builders is not. Mindalike came from experiencing that gap repeatedly.


"I was the person at ETHGlobal who stopped finding collaborators and built alone. Every hackathon, same story: great builders, no way to find each other mid-build. We needed Mindalike. It didn't exist. So we're building it."
Two builders. One session. Shared context. The wedge proves that people prefer building together.
Sessions become projects. Projects become relationships. Context compounds. Switching costs grow.
Find collaborators. Match with experts. Build with AI agents. The coordination layer becomes the operating system.
"Two users create a session. A session creates a relationship. A relationship becomes a project. More projects attract more builders. The network compounds from the wedge outward."
Build and collaborate. Full access to the core Mindavibe experience.
More AI usage, advanced collaboration features, and project capabilities.
Shared workspaces, collaboration infrastructure, and higher limits.
Prove that builders prefer building with others. Instrument retention from day one.
Sessions, context, projects, relationships. Build the switching cost layer.
Experts, collaborators, and AI agents working inside the same workflow.
Long-term: Mindalike becomes the infrastructure for AI-native teams. SaaS seats now. Platform fees on expert collaborations later.
The companies that define this decade will own the workflow between people and AI systems. Slack won team communication. Figma won team design. GitHub won team version control. Mindalike wins team AI creation.


The window for collaborative AI infrastructure is open. The category does not yet exist. That is what we are building.